Article author: Asatro News Published: 15th day of Ēostre-mōnaþ 2264.RE / 15th day of Ēostre-mōnaþ 2014

Jewish-Supremacists in the Political, Media and Financial establishment are intent on increasing mass-non-European-immigration into England specifically, whilst covering up their genocidal effects


Jewish-Supremacists in the Political, Media and Financial establishment are intent on increasing mass-non-white-immigration into England specifically, whilst covering up the degenerative effect and real magnitude of their mass-non-white-immigration onslaught against our nation.

The UKs population, if we do not intervene will grow by 9.5-10million people by 2040, around 150% of this growth will come from immigrants, out of that total overburden percentage (accounting for our sub-replacement birthrate) about 60% will be due to non-whites and 40% due to Eastern European immigrants, on the current course.

The horrific effects of mass-non-white-immigration and of poor, uneducated slavs from Eastern Europe is causing a massive awakening of otherwise liberal young parents and late parents of the 1970s-1980s generations.

There is now a 130,000 shortage in primary school places relative to the population of children, despite a 100% increase in the primary school places budget allocation under Labour due to the soaring birth rate of non-whites and the inflow of hundreds of thousands of their immigrant children, but also of Eastern European children, which face the brunt of non-whites in the inner city, where Eastern European immigrants are on the front-line against non-white crime and demographic occupation.

Many immigrant families file fraudulent school application forms to get their children into primary schools as soon as they enter the country, denying local English children their desired primary school choice.

To all the English Mothers fed up with having to drive their children miles to school: Jewish-Supremacist enforced mass-non-white-immigration has been the PRIMARY cause of your financial and logistical costs and difficulties.

The overflow of the primary level state schooling system will inevitably increase the ferocity of the awakening of millions of our folk, as to the reality of the horrific quantities of non-whites, in the sole age group non-whites are almost the majority within.

This overflow of the primary school system will act as a demographic early warning system alert in the national, political conscious of our people, relying only upon us to mobilize this opinion unleashing.

In 2013 there were 84 schools with no White-British students (all inner-city state schools with failing standards, due to the non-white students themselves (allegedly) ), primarily in Birmingham, this figure will only have increased.

The anti-English and anti-European racist agenda in allegedly multiple universities in the UK has also become statistically self-evident as Chinese students are now 23% of all postgraduate students, only 26% of postgraduate students are English.

Although there is hope, for the international student numbers are starting to fall for the 1st time in decades, following a crackdown on the criminal student VISA exploitation by non-whites, allegedly with the complicity of multiple Universities and, allegedly Jewish dominated admissions services and teams at multiple universities, as has been conclusively proven in the United States already

The socialist Labour party policies that are now having an additional delayed effect, has hit the number of private school educated English students, forcing high-end middle-class children to be placed into the state education GULAG. 

Although this experience of the harshness of non-white children will positively racially awaken some of the wealthy children from liberal university educated parents*.

*This process of school-years awakening is described by Dr Kevin MacDonald on the video at the bottom of this linked article: Anti-White descrimination and propaganda at Universities

The now openly and self-evidently Jewish led Labour party (rather than covertly led through the party mechanism and unions, which is also the force which elected Ed Miliband in the Labour leader elections) has refused to change course on immigration to any substantive degree, making ambiguous comments, and PR appeals, whilst seeking to increase the number of foreign students in the UK, which is already the biggest source of non-EU immigration of non-whites. 


Labour still doesn't grasp public anger at immigration.

Article author: Chairman of Migration Watch UK Published: 11th day of Ēostre-mōnaþ 2264.RE (2014.CE)

Yvette Cooper’s speech on immigration yesterday illustrates the huge gap between the public and politicians. The shadow home secretary’s remarks amounted to an elegant camouflage for Labour’s absence of policy on the key issues.

The central issue is not whether immigration is good or bad, but what is a desirable scale — given that 77 per cent of the public want it reduced, 50 per cent “by a lot”. 

 Ms Cooper made her speech on the day that the Office for National Statistics (ONS) finally admitted failing to count all the migrants from Eastern Europe when the Labour government, alone except for Ireland and Sweden, opened our labour market to them in 2004. 

The new figures bring net foreign migration on their watch to nearly four million, two thirds from outside the EU. It is the sheer scale of this inflow that has, rightly, alarmed public opinion. 

 Ms Cooper had some useful ideas to reduce the exploitation of EU migrants by unscrupulous employers. But again, the central issue was ducked. 

They are not “benefit tourists”, but the financial incentives for Eastern Europeans to come and work in Britain are undeniably huge, especially if they bring their families. 

Some can earn eight times their pay at home. 

Will Labour renegotiate to remove both in-work and out-of-work benefits from EU workers, placing them on the same footing as migrants from the rest of the world, who normally have no recourse to public funds for the first five years? 

 The third key issue is what to do about those non-EU migrants over whom the government does have powers. 

Under sustained pressure from John Humphrys on the Today programme, Ms Cooper said that Labour wanted lower migration but would not set a target. 

 There is a case for refining a target to those who can be controlled directly. 

But the absence of any target would leave ministers wide open to pressure from powerful interest groups. 

Indeed, Ms Cooper has already caved in to academia by promising to remove foreign students from the net migration figures — yet they comprise 60 per cent of the non-EU inflow and are a significant source of abuse. 

 If the speech was intended to shore up working-class support in the face of depredations by UKIP, it is unlikely to succeed. Indeed it might even increase people’s anger that Labour remains deaf to their real concerns. 


 It is evident, that in referring to the comparative demographic genocide of urban populations of the European and English populations from places such as Birmingham, Manchester and dozens of other towns and cities in the UK: denial of this genocide perpetrated and committed by Jewish-Supremacists through the lobbying of and corrupting of the Westminster government and (the founding objectives of the Jewish-led ) EU government to ruthlessly enforce mass non-white immigration has been and is still being denied, whilst simultaneously being increased in its degenerative magnitude. 

STAGE 10 OF GENOCIDE: DENIAL is the tenth stage that always follows genocides. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators... cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses. They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims. They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile.

-Genocidewatch.org

Nick Clegg understated the scale of mass-immigration by 500,000 migrants in the 2nd EU debate with Nigel Farage. Indicating not only that Labour denies the degenerative, defiling and destructive effect mass-non-white-immigration has had, but that the Liberal Democrats are now de-facto complicit in attempting to cover such up. 

Only Migration Watch UK corrected Nick Clegg for his alleged 'mistake', the entirety of the mainstream media, including all of their researchers and experts were complicit in refusing to point out Nick Clegg's error, including the leftwing chair of the debtate. 

This is reflective of the media, education and political establishment wide effort to placate, disinform, and manipulate our folk in relation to the horrific and full scale of mass-non-white-immigration, ultimately amounting to a failed cover-up, as 89-95% of English folk dislike/hate mass-immigration and nearing 10% (roughly 7-9%) of our population want the full deportation of all non-whites and Eastern Europeans.

89% of the overall national population wants a reduction in mass-immigration, according to a YouGov/Channel 4 poll conducted last year.

This figure has only likely grown in the face of the failed cover-up of the sheer scale of mass-immigration. 

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) itself was recently forced to account for its errors as exposed by MigrationWatch UK 

 ----------------------------------- 

Article author: Migration Watch UK Press release  Published: 18th day of Sol-mōnaþ 2264.RE (2014.CE)

 Migration Watch UK Press Comment on Immigration Under Labour February 28, 2014 The ONS have today adjusted the net migration statistics between 2001 and 2011 to reflect the results of the 2011 Census. 

Commenting, Sir Andrew Green, Chairman of Migration Watch UK, said: 

 "Having discovered that the Census found nearly half a million more East Europeans in Britain than the immigration figures had suggested, the ONS have at last adjusted the official statistics in today’s release. As a result, we can now see that net immigration under Labour peaked at 320,000 in 2004/5 and that total net foreign migration came to nearly 4 million during their period in office" 

 See Table 1 of today's ONS Migration Statistics Quarterly Report which can be found here: [source]

----------------------------------------------

Ever notice how Wikipedia routinely under-states the numbers of non-whites in our nations and no-one has updated them since the 2001 census?

Allegedly Jewish-Immigration lobby groups and far-left organisations have conducted anti-information campaigns to edit the true nature of mass-immigration out of the most used information source in the world: Wikipedia.

This effort is far worse than what (allegedly) Jewish manipulators within the civil service did with Office for National Statistics data, for Wikipedia is where people go first and foremost.

Evidently stage 10 has been horrifically revealed as the reality in relation to inner city urban populations and the gradual erosion of the European majority of all European majority nations and of the minority European populations in South Africa and other territories.

The attempted denial of the horrific effects of mass-non-white immigration is being conducted on a governmental and far-left pressure-group wide level.

Although there is hope, for concerned folk within UKIP and Migration Watch UK (organisations with the capacity to conduct their own independent research) have partially and increasingly prevented the (estimated) 83% Jewish owned media companies from outright lying on the subject in the last 2 years.

Migration Watch UK recently published a Press release demonstrating that immigrants have cost the tax payer over £140 billion since 1995 alone.

Article author: Migration Watch UK Press release  Published: 11th day of Hrēþ-mōnaþ 2264.RE (2014.CE)

Immigrants have cost the tax payer over £140 billion since 1995 March 13, 2014 Recent immigrants from 2001 to 2011 might have cost over £25 bn [within the total of £140] Migration Watch UK today issued a new assessment of the cost of immigration to the tax payer.


The outcome is that immigrants cost the taxpayer over £140 billion or more than £22 million a day over the 17 years 1995 - 2011.

The Migration Watch study followed the methodology of a recent paper from the Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM) but queried some very unrealistic assumptions. Even on their own assumptions, CReAM had calculated that the overall effect of immigration since 1995 has been a net cost of £95 billion.


This result was contained in a table annexed to their paper but it was not even mentioned in the text of the report, still less in the summary or the press release - a truly astonishing omission.

CReAM also claimed a net benefit of £25 billion from recent migrants which they described as “a very sizeable fiscal contribution”.

However, analysis by Migration Watch finds that the true figure is more likely to be a net cost of that amount. To get any positive result from this group, CReAM had to make the extreme assumption that even the most recent arrivals contribute as much as long-term migrants and the UK-born when both their younger age and lower incomes make this most unlikely.

They also included the EU 15 with the A8 which had the effect of obscuring the cost of the growing number and proportion of relatively low paid migrants from Eastern Europe.


They then overstated the revenue paid by recent migrants by assuming for example that: These immigrants had on arrival, the same amount of UK investments as the resident population.

They also immediately occupied the same kind of homes and therefore paid the same amount of council tax as the resident population.

Self employed people pay all of the UK’s Business Rates, Amongst the self-employed, agricultural and construction workers pay the same amount of income tax as lawyers and accountants As regards government expenditures on these migrants, they underestimated them by assuming for example that: Immigrants received no more in means-tested welfare payments than the average for the general population, despite clear evidence of lower income. 


 Immigrants claiming housing benefit received no more than the UK average despite their much higher concentration in London and the South East where payments are nearly twice as high as in low cost areas.

The effect of adjusting for these assumptions is to reduce the “contribution” of recent EEA migrants from £22bn to nothing at all.

This disposes of the CReAM claim that they contributed 34% more in revenues than they received in state expenditures.

As for a further claim that recent EEA migrants were only half as likely to claim ‘benefits or tax credits’, this overlooks the fact that they disproportionately claim the more expensive of these. 


For example while they might be much less likely to claim Job Seeker’s Allowance (JSA) they are much more likely to claim both housing benefit, which in London is on average twice the amount of JSA, and Tax credits which can easily be four times that amount or more.


Commenting, Sir Andrew Green, Chairman of Migration Watch UK, said : “Our report finally disposes of the immigration lobby’s oft repeated claims that immigration reduces our tax burden. 

The total cost is high and increased dramatically between 1995 and 2011, providing no compensation for the overcrowding of this island which we are experiencing, largely as a result of immigration.”

The CReAM report can be found here [SOURCE]

The calculations referred to above are based on the average cost method which CReAM paper favoured in reporting their results. 

They also considered the marginal cost method which some other researchers have preferred.

The Migration Watch paper addresses that method in Annex A to this paper, with broadly similar results.

Although many of the victims of this genocide, have been displaced, many Birmingham residents have moved to Devon.  

There are entire streets in South Devon where the population is formed almost entirely of English folk who have had to leave Birmingham.

Combine this awakening of these folk, to such an extent that they moved over 200 miles to get away from the non-white hordes, plus the anti-non-white-immigrant sentiments held by 89-94% of English folk and it is evident, that although many urban areas have been lost, a colossal political uprising is underway.

This political uprising will see our entire nation resurge, expel these non-white immigrants and more than avenge the victims of multi-racial genocide that Jewish-Supremacists, through our corrupt, Jewish-Supremacist infested political, media, financial and educational establishment have waged against us and all Europeans worldwide through their lies, manipulation and the ensuing damage to our morale, identity, nations, laws and society.

Our people will although inevitably emerge stronger as a result of this great Ragnarok of our times, as is self-evident on the level of eugenics, politics, culture and future educational imperatives that will surge into the hearts of our folk as we purge the anti-English racists from our entire nation and all European populated nations.

This shows the absolute necessity of standing tall and defiant NOW in defence of our racial folk, this is a call to action, it is time to start mobilizing our entire nation, through us Nationalist, Asatru folk first and foremost, and with our English nation: the hopes, ambitions and inspiration of all our noble Germanic folk the world over.

England shall lead the way.

 

 RISE STRONG, STAND STEADFAST, START STRIVING FOR OUR FOLK