Article author: Asatro News Published: 29th day of Ēostre-mōnaþ 2264.RE / 29th day of Ēostre-mōnaþ 2014

Jewish-Academic subversive, malicious 'Out of Africa Hypothesis' annihilated.


The mainstream media and scientific community has been revising the date of the 'out' part of the 'Out of Africa Hypothesis' that was never even a theory ,merely an unproven hypothesis, of what is solely a malicious, subversive and self-evident Jewish-Marxist academic lie enforced through the mainstream biology curriculum since the 1980s after a Jewish-Supremacist media and clandestine academic subversion-campaign, the malicious, subversive lie that was the 'out of Africa Hypothesis' is becoming more and more self-evident, as proven by multiple research papers and undeniable archaeological and genetic evidence.

In recent years this entire crude 'hypothesis' has been disproved and yet is still cited orally as an anti-European uniqueness catchphrase by Jewish-Marxists, and their indoctrinated followers in academia, culture and the media, who impervious to recent scientific studies, are akin to Talmudic or Biblical fanatics, refusing to observe the modern genetic reality that has demolished their religiously upheld hypothesis that sought to defame, degrade and defile the uniqueness and sacredness of the European folk blood lines historically and in modern culture.

Scientific evidence conclusively refuting the mere hypothesis theory of modern humanity’s African genesis is well accepted and known to those advanced scientists familiar with the most recent and accurate scientific papers on the human Genome, Mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomes that are used to trace the origins and form of the ancestral DNA.

Despite and in fanatical and unscientific opposition to this overwhelming body of new evidence, due to the Jewish-Supremacist hegemony within academia, as with Politics, Philosophy, Economics, Sociology and Psychology, even in Biology, there is now, once again, an undeniable attempt to prevent this new evidence from being accepted, even though it conclusively disproves the out of Africa hypothesis.

This is ultimately exactly why its acceptance is being slowed and resisted by Jewish-Marxist fanatics in faculty offices from the United States and all over the Western academic circles, because it annihilates and exposes as fraudulent the Jewish-academic-supported and promoted non-theory, the mere crude Hypothesis that without any real evidence arrogantly and oppressively asserted with religious force that all humans came from Africa.

This crude, un-verified 'Out of Africa' hypothesis that came to prominence in the 1980/90s after a subversive media-supported campaign to maliciously and fanatically surgically remove the very idea of race from the one subject where it had the most elemental role: Genetics.

The un-proven hypothesis was used for decades to underpin at a foundational level the Judeo-Egalitarian, anti-European genocidal lies that all Humans are the same, which is clearly and transparently used to support and quiet opposition to mass non-white immigration: thus you should not oppose mass-non-white-immigration into only white countries because everyone came from Africa.

When an un-verified hypothesis, with no factual content, is used as the foundation for a series of lies against the European peoples ancestral origin, the anti-European bias, bigotry and malicious agenda within the Jewish dominated academic circles becomes clear.

-The below section includes out-takes from Steven Strong's article: DNA Evidence Debunks the “Out-of-Africa” Theory of Human Evolution.-  

Humanity’s indirect ancestry has been traced back to Spain during pre-Homo sapien-sapiens times, with a substantial influence from Denisovan genes. So it appears the same hominid who is most closely linked to the original genes of Australia was wandering around the Spanish countryside some 400,000 years ago, well before any African Homo sapien could be claimed to have stepped in, on or outside African soil. “Scientists have found the oldest DNA evidence yet of humans’ biological history. But instead of neatly clarifying human evolution, the finding is adding new mysteries”. 

The femur bone found in a Spanish rural cave was analysed by Dr. Matthias Meyer (geneticist Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology). When Meyer and his colleagues “drilled into the femur, they found ancient human DNA inside, just as they hoped”. But past this point, nothing went according to their script. Much to their surprise, the DNA they recovered – the oldest yet by over 100,000 years – “most closely resembles DNA from an enigmatic lineage of humans known as Denisovans”, originally thought to be 80,000 years old and confined to the Northern Asian region. 

This finding was the cause of great consternation. “Everyone had a hard time believing it at first” Dr. Meyer said. “So we generated more and more data to nail it down”. 

Not surprisingly, their further research only confirmed the original results. As was the case with the genome studies of original hair, “the new finding is hard to reconcile with the [accepted] picture of human evolution”. 

None of what they found fits into any traditional version of human ascension, and according to Dr. Luis Asauaga (Paleoanthropologist, Universdad Complutense de Madrid) this discovery demands that “we have to rethink the whole story”.

And that last statement by Dr. Asauaga really sums up the case for the entire Out-of-Africa theory: it is a “story”, it was never a fact. From the very beginning it was always a “probably” at best. Male Y-Chromosome history forces this re-thinking or complete demolition of the Jewish-academic manipulations on the subject of genetics far beyond what has been discovered on the matrilineal genetic ancestry.

Dr Greg Jeffreys Y-Chromosome papers released over the last decade stand united in their denial of any African input. And this is by no means a recent occurrence, as evidenced by a paper released in 1999 by Australian researchers Vandenburg and colleagues. 

As it was with other studies, the results were as inconvenient as they were unexpected. Vandenburg found that “Australian Y-chromosome diversity is surprisingly limited”. In contrast with the Genome researchers’ assumption that Australia was literally sealed off genetically until their land was stolen in 1788, Vandenburg made note of “two haplotypes unique to Australian Aboriginals”. 

But if indeed Africans sailed to Australia and were immediately isolated genetically, this just should not happen – every original haplotype should have close to an identical African match.

Further information added to the African inconsistencies, while also reinforcing an observation offered by Rebecca Cann in relation to mtDNA evidence that suggested the first Original Homo sapien-sapiens were sourced from “two lineages”. 

The results gathered “were compared with other worldwide populations” which “produced 41 unique haplotypes”. Instead of an even spread amongst so many haplotypes, in Australia a far more intense clustering was present in that “most (78%) of Australian haplotypes fell into two clusters, possibly indicating two original, separate lineages of Aboriginal Australians”. To that end, since at least two Original haplotype groups have no African counter-part, there can be no African involvement, mtDNA or Y-chromosomes in either of the “two lineages”. 

 As such, a very recent paper on Y-chromosomes released in 2012, (Re-Examing the “Out of Africa” Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasians) in the Light of DNA Genealogy written by Anatole A. Klyosov and Igor L. Rozhanski) only confirms the denial of any African ancestry in Australia, and strongly supports the existence of a “common ancestor” who “would not necessarily be in Africa. In fact, it was never proven that he lived in Africa”.

Central to results of this extensive examination of haplogroups (7,556) was the absence of any African genes. So lacking was the sampling of African genetic involvement, the researchers stated in their introduction that: “the finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid, as well as all non-African groups do not carry either SNI’s M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262 …” 

 There are 11 more entries in this list of non-starters, all missing from both Europeoids and “all non-African groups,” which obviously includes the Original Australians. With the Original people exhibiting an intense clustering into two groups, haplogroups not present in any African genes and an absence of dozens of African genetic markers, it is very difficult nigh on impossible to sustain any link between Africa.

The researchers are adamant that their extensive study “offers evidence to re-examine the validity of the Out-of-Africa concept”. They see no genetic proof substantiating an African precedence in the Homo sapien tree, and maintain that “a more plausible interpretation might have been that both current Africans and non-Africans descended separately from a more ancient common ancestor, thus forming a proverbial fork” or from 2-4 generally distinct regional population blocks.

We regard the claim of “a more plausible explanation” as a gross understatement, since there is absolutely nothing plausibly African turning up in any test tubes. In fact, the researchers made note of their repeated absence stating “not one non-African participant out of more than 400 individuals in the Project tested positive to any of thirteen ‘African’ sub-clades of haplogroup A”.

The only remaining uncertainty relates to the identity of this “more ancient common ancestor”. All that can be stated with confidence is that humanity’s ancestor did not reside in Africa, but “probably” Australia, after which according to the regional population model, human races formed through evolving in separate environments in geographically isolated areas. 

The impact of other forks from the Homo sapien tree is although under-investigated and yet already shows that the first humans were not one coherent group.

-The above section included out-takes from Steven Strong's article: DNA Evidence Debunks the “Out-of-Africa” Theory of Human Evolution.-  

None the less it is self-evident that modern Caucasians, Asians and Negroids compose distinct racial groups, with distinct and unique genetic ancestral lines, that are well over 400,000 years apart in their core original populations, even the Jewish-academic occupied genetics talking circles are being forced to concede that the human races are a lot older than they would like us to believe. 

 This massive distinction between the races of varying intelligences and capabilities, varying genomes, disease traits, psychologies, phenotypes, genotypes, basic structural divergences in the skull (Germanic dolichocephalic skulls/ vs. Non-Germanic brachycephalic skulls), pelvis (Wide Pelvis in European women allowing for children with larger skulls vs. restricted African Pelvis compared to all other races), and overall skeletal differences and proportions, followed by muscle and cartilage (nose structure) tissue differences, blood type differences on average and skin differences.

 This self-evident reality demolishes the Jewish-Egalitarian and subversive Marxist manipulations in academia in relation to race, ancestry and modern biology altogether. 

Simultaneously showing and reinforcing the fact that the reality of genetics has absolute and unchangeable effects on the racial composition of racial groups, highlighting the necessity of racial separation in order to prevent the destruction of our race, but also numerous other racial lineages from the genetic catastrophe and defilement of those racial groups that is produced by the intersection of racial groups.

[Power Point Download] Academic presentation outlining the basic details of two (mainstream) conflicting theories of Human pre-historic evolution.